Actually there is talk about Canada paying the bigger amount of the security costs.
Poor Prince Harry
Re: Poor Prince Harry
Jackie
http://inthelandofthelivingskiesii.blogspot.ca/
http://inthelandofthelivingskiesii.blogspot.ca/
Re: Poor Prince Harry
As I said earlier. I doubt the government would let him forgo the security. I doubt Canada's government would let them be without security even if they would rather be without it. From what I have seen both Bush junior and Jimmy Carter consider it both a blessing and a curse but we as a country are not leaving either of them unprotected. I admire them for making their own way and believe his mother would as well.
And while it's a small chorus I am really tired of hearing it al being the wife's fault. The man has a mind of his own and knows how to use it.
And while it's a small chorus I am really tired of hearing it al being the wife's fault. The man has a mind of his own and knows how to use it.
Re: Poor Prince Harry
Actually 73% of Canadians do not want to see our government pay for their security out of our taxes. Just the way it is around here right now.
I love the royal family, but really since they are millionaires (worth about 45 million at this time) and Prince Charles gives them money from his private fortune of 2 to 4 million a year, I really think they can afford to pay their own security. It cost our government almost 250,000k when they were here for the month. Can you just imagine what it will cost when they live here 6 months of the year?
I love the royal family, but really since they are millionaires (worth about 45 million at this time) and Prince Charles gives them money from his private fortune of 2 to 4 million a year, I really think they can afford to pay their own security. It cost our government almost 250,000k when they were here for the month. Can you just imagine what it will cost when they live here 6 months of the year?
Jackie
http://inthelandofthelivingskiesii.blogspot.ca/
http://inthelandofthelivingskiesii.blogspot.ca/
Re: Poor Prince Harry
I think its pretty obvious that I am not a fan of the Royal family.
But , OF COURSE, H and M need and will get security , but I don't see why I , a taxpayer should fork out a penny. ( all Charles money can be traced back to me, so he can fork out EVERY single penny it costs to police H and M. Which because of their stupid selfishness will be MORE than if they remained where they were.
Why should H and M think their HOSTS ( Canada ) should pay for anything ???
They are completely "tone deaf " to their actions, frankly they are coming across as a bit thick to be honest.........
Glad that they can't use HRH.
It won't make any difference though , cos you can just imagine the gushing nerds who will be " employing " them introdcucing them as Princess or whatever cos the only reason they'll get any work at all will be because, in the mind of their employers
" ITS THE ROYALS !!!! OOOOOOOHHHH< EXCITING !!!!
Glad they are having to hand back £2.4 ( over 3 million ) for Frogmore. Bet they didn't offer, and anyway, its not their money so easy to hand it over.....
Harry hasn't made a good choice of partner and I am very sad that its impacted on his relationship with his brother.
They are beneath contempt in this instance.
Poor Canada. Don't give these losers a free lunch. Maybe their celebrity friends can fund their lifestyle.
But , OF COURSE, H and M need and will get security , but I don't see why I , a taxpayer should fork out a penny. ( all Charles money can be traced back to me, so he can fork out EVERY single penny it costs to police H and M. Which because of their stupid selfishness will be MORE than if they remained where they were.
Why should H and M think their HOSTS ( Canada ) should pay for anything ???
They are completely "tone deaf " to their actions, frankly they are coming across as a bit thick to be honest.........
Glad that they can't use HRH.
It won't make any difference though , cos you can just imagine the gushing nerds who will be " employing " them introdcucing them as Princess or whatever cos the only reason they'll get any work at all will be because, in the mind of their employers
" ITS THE ROYALS !!!! OOOOOOOHHHH< EXCITING !!!!
Glad they are having to hand back £2.4 ( over 3 million ) for Frogmore. Bet they didn't offer, and anyway, its not their money so easy to hand it over.....
Harry hasn't made a good choice of partner and I am very sad that its impacted on his relationship with his brother.
They are beneath contempt in this instance.
Poor Canada. Don't give these losers a free lunch. Maybe their celebrity friends can fund their lifestyle.
Re: Poor Prince Harry
EDITED TO ADD.rinty wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 4:30 am I think its pretty obvious that I am not a fan of the Royal family.
But , OF COURSE, H and M need and will get security , but I don't see why I , a taxpayer should fork out a penny. ( all Charles money can be traced back to me, so he can fork out EVERY single penny it costs to police H and M. Which because of their stupid selfishness will be MORE than if they remained where they were.
Why should H and M think their HOSTS ( Canada ) should pay for anything ???
They are completely "tone deaf " to their actions, frankly they are coming across as a bit thick to be honest.........
Glad that they can't use HRH.
It won't make any difference though , cos you can just imagine the gushing nerds who will be " employing " them introdcucing them as Princess or whatever cos the only reason they'll get any work at all will be because, in the mind of their employers
" ITS THE ROYALS !!!! OOOOOOOHHHH< EXCITING !!!!
Glad they are having to hand back £2.4 ( over 3 million ) for Frogmore. Bet they didn't offer, and anyway, its not their money so easy to hand it over.....
Harry hasn't made a good choice of partner and I am very sad that its impacted on his relationship with his brother.
They are beneath contempt in this instance.
Poor Canada. Don't give these losers a free lunch. Maybe their celebrity friends can fund their lifestyle.
Just seen a news item that points out these conniving losers has registered " as a brand " ....their website as SUSSEX ROYAL.
Not any more sunshine, take that down and put up something that more reflects their lifestyle and attitudes......
Like " Hendonists Rule ! "...............see, I've given them a vaguely royal name for the thickos that still want their " input " ???? Like they have anything to offer ..........
Loving the pictures of Meghan in Canada with her " empowering wimmen " groups........looks like a dozen women at a coffee morning, but I'm ready to be corrected......
Re: Poor Prince Harry
rinty wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 5:15 am EDITED TO ADD.
Just seen a news item that points out these conniving losers has registered " as a brand " ....their website as SUSSEX ROYAL.
Not any more sunshine, take that down and put up something that more reflects their lifestyle and attitudes......
Like " Hedonists Rule ! "...............see, I've given them a vaguely royal name for the thickos that still want their " input " ???? Like they have anything to offer ..........
Loving the pictures of Meghan in Canada with her " empowering wimmen " groups........looks like a dozen women at a coffee morning, but I'm ready to be corrected......